And that's a bad thing?

I used to actively pursue it

This is progress, my boy



And, on another note, I might be safe from Liz for a couple of days

That's what you think

Heh, yeah.

She might object to everything I posted and demand a rewrite

You're doomed

Bipedibop...

I'm doomed?

Do you mean that because I signed up?

Or for making the mistake of posting more in the thread than anyone but Liz?

Or did my latest post in the Guilloux Mansion just suck?

Too many questions!!!

Oh, poor Callidus. Forever doomed with too many questions that no one can answer

Hola!



All of the above

Hey, Kob! Did you film your house and all yet?

There is only one valid response to this:

Good. I enjoy watching you panic

?

Panic?

I never panic

I merely use emoticons to convey a general state of unease and anxiety

Nope lol.



So in simpler terms, you mean panic? Haha

AND I JUST GOT THE CLEAR GAMEBOY!!!!

Much cheaper than what I expected too!

CONGRATS!

Ugh, I hate arguing with people on the internet.

Not talking about you Kobby, I'm in an argument over at Bethesda, I think it's going to get ugly...





Panic is such an ugly word.



Nicely done.

This post has been edited by Callidus Thorn: Jan 22 2014, 09:00 PM

What's the argument about?

A guy started a thread about a different type of "pure mage". Rather than relying on fireballs or summoned critters, this one fights with bound weapons and armour. He thinks that because the weapons and armour and spells rather than actual weapons, this sitll fits the criteria of "pure mage".

I am arguing that the character is at best a hybrid, whose focus is melee combat, not magic, and therefore doesn't even vaguely resemble a "pure mage".

That's pretty much what it boils down to.


This is why I hate arguments on the internet. I do seem to find my way into quite a few of them though...

This post has been edited by Callidus Thorn: Jan 22 2014, 09:11 PM