Want to know more than most modern cosmologists?, CLICK HERE! Options

[DoomedOne]

Thunderbolts of the Gods

When ancient myths and modern cosmology combine into one fluid, easily understood model of the universe. Black holes and dark matter? Not real.

[Olen]

The 'science' here has far too many flaws. Interstellar space isn't 'teeming' with particles, and the relative strength of gravity to electromagnetic forces is far more complex than a simple scaler (and stronger with respect to what anyway?). Also almost every body in the universe, by virtue of the massivly higher density of strength of the electromagnetic force, is almost uncharged and thus doesn't interact electromagnetically with other large objects.

"It is possible the predominant force in the universe is not gravity" - is entirly a matter of scale. In the nucleus of an atom graity is more or less nothing - the strong force being predominant, in a solar system its everything.

And comets simply are made of ice - there a clear absorbsion band corresponding to water in their tails.

They fail to say why the cosmos would have changed in the last few thousand years given its age. Also if it has changed why did it change in such a way that it went out suddenly on earth? The light we see it by travels at lightspeed so when we look at distant things we see them as they were millions of years ago.

They have a lot of people saying how it all fits together but fail to provide any actual evidence.

And that was the first ten minutes. I'm not convinced.

[bbqplatypus]

The 'science' here has far too many flaws. Interstellar space isn't 'teeming' with particles, and the relative strength of gravity to electromagnetic forces is far more complex than a simple scaler (and stronger with respect to what anyway?). Also almost every body in the universe, by virtue of the massivly higher density of strength of the electromagnetic force, is almost uncharged and thus doesn't interact electromagnetically with other large objects.

"It is possible the predominant force in the universe is not gravity" - is entirly a matter of scale. In the nucleus of an atom graity is more or less nothing - the strong force being predominant, in a solar system its everything.

And comets simply are made of ice - there a clear absorbsion band corresponding to water in their tails.

They fail to say why the cosmos would have changed in the last few thousand years given its age. Also if it has changed why did it change in such a way that it went out suddenly on earth? The light we see it by travels at lightspeed so when we look at distant things we see them as they were millions of years ago.

They have a lot of people saying how it all fits together but fail to provide any actual evidence.

And that was the first ten minutes. I'm not convinced.

Yeah - the only reason I kept watching in spite of that was because I was EXPECTING to find flaws. I like looking into pseudoscientific hokum like this - I feel it strengthens my mind and gives me clearer knowledge of the way the universe ACTUALLY works via the conclusions I reach using critical thinking.