Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> From paid mods to ..., Reversed direction?
ghastley
post Oct 31 2016, 02:31 PM
Post #1


Councilor
Group Icon
Joined: 13-December 10



This sticky post on bethesda.net is interesting in the light of the "paid mods" fiasco.

This appears to go even further in the opposite direction than I thought possible, and perhaps even prohibits the "donate" button at the Nexus.

It does make me wonder if that whole thing was Valve's idea, and had nothing to do with Bethesda/Zenimax, and if it heralds a move away from Steam entirely?


--------------------
Mods for The Elder Scrolls single-player games, and I play ESO.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
SubRosa
post Oct 31 2016, 09:13 PM
Post #2


Ancient
Group Icon
Joined: 14-March 10
From: Between The Worlds



As much as I would love to see Bethesda divorce itself from Steam, I suspect it is more simply a matter of Bethesda trying to do some belated damage control after all the backlash from their paid mods attempt. I would not lay the latter all upon Steam's feet either. Valve did not hold a gun to Todd Howard's head and make him an offer he could not refuse. Both companies saw a way to make money for literally no work on their part. Now that paid mods sleep with the fishes, I am sure Bethesda wants to distance itself as much as possible from the whole thing.


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mALX
post Nov 1 2016, 09:51 AM
Post #3


Ancient
Group Icon
Joined: 14-March 10
From: Cyrodiil, the Wastelands, and BFE TN



QUOTE(SubRosa @ Oct 31 2016, 04:13 PM) *

As much as I would love to see Bethesda divorce itself from Steam, I suspect it is more simply a matter of Bethesda trying to do some belated damage control after all the backlash from their paid mods attempt. I would not lay the latter all upon Steam's feet either. Valve did not hold a gun to Todd Howard's head and make him an offer he could not refuse. Both companies saw a way to make money for literally no work on their part. Now that paid mods sleep with the fishes, I am sure Bethesda wants to distance itself as much as possible from the whole thing.



I agree with your assessment here 100%. And I have all the original copies of the EULA that came with each game I bought from Bethesda; and I would have to dig them out and look it up first because I don't want to rely on my memory; but isn't this the original wording's meaning as well?

(meaning they were breaking their own EULA by trying to get in on selling mods to begin with).

I also agree that Steam may have brought the idea of charging for mods up to Bethesda; but they were willing to be swayed (and I would guess without much persuasion required).

I noticed Bethnet has mod hosting now too, and the paid mod fiasco instantly came to mind since all this "Bethnet" BS started once their paid mod fiasco was shut down.

It struck me back when that paid mod thing was going on, that Bethesda is going to try and take control of the mods (so by their sudden decision to host them most def feels connected to the upcoming releases of any future TES and possibly Fallout games.


l


--------------------
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post



Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th August 2025 - 02:23 AM