Funnily enough, your views just now were a sort of libertarian approach to communism, shared mostly by anarchists. I think that if humans were down on their luck the community should help them, but majorly with job enrollment, not just with giving them money and expecting them to find a job on their own. I think welfare of the unemployed should be kept to communities, and I think people shouldn't be left to sink if they are being dosed some bad luck.
This is what I really feel, from each according to his ability, to each according to his need. Some people (disabled, veterans, elderly, orphans, natural disaster survivors) need more than regular people, and all people should at least attempt to commit the most they can to society.
But those morals don't work in a society where everything is about possessions and the bottom line. The entire way the society works was drawn out by the richest, so naturally that's why it favors the welathy, and that to me is not equality, they didn't do anything to deserve it, they're not giving anything to society to deserve more than anybody else, they just know how to stay focused on the bottom line.
That's why everything I do, I do for the proletariat. That's why my dream when I'm older is to go to countries like the United Arab Emirates, Haite and Co,bodia, and organize Unions even if it requires me to become a target by the CIA (as the CIA are often behind the assassinations of Union Organizers) because I believe in a global economy if we can stop the US from leeching off these puppet governments, then the proletariat revolution will naturally follow up the chain to them. I can't break the hold the rich have over society from the United Staes, but I can atleast catalize the fight for freedom in other countries.
--------------------
A man once asked the Buddha, "How does one escape the heat of the summer sun?"
And the Buddha replied, "Why not try crawling into the blazing furnace?"
|