I'm having a hard time understanding why they would have a huge stock of medicine infected with HIV, if that now is the truth. Wouldn't they have detected the infection earlier and removed the infected products?
On the other hand, IF they now DID sell HIV-infected medicaments and they knew about it then it's entirelly Bayers responsability and they should be punished thereafter. However, if the companies/countries buying ALSO knew of this infection and still bought it with the idea of continuing the distribution they have an equal responsability.
This post has been edited by Bofra: May 31 2006, 12:55 AM
--------------------
FarFallen - The Game Website | Forum Join the forum now!
It's not the magnitude of our actions but the amount of love put into them that matters - Mother Teresa
However, if the companies/countries buying ALSO knew of this infection and still bought it with the idea of continuing the distribution they have an equal responsability.
Aye, I agree. I have no info on this, but as soon as I find anything, I'll post it. If somebody finds a full article about this, please post it
--------------------
''Try not to become a man of success, but rather try to become a man of value.'' - Albert Einstein
''One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics, is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.'' - Plato