somehow missed this post.
QUOTE(Pisces @ Jun 2 2007, 11:28 PM)

I don't see the US (or any other country) stepping up to the plate and putting forth significant resources into Dafur, its not that the UN hasn't asked (because it has), its that the world hasn't responded.
Also, the US wouldn't dare leave the UN as it would cripple their economy.
1. Since the UN is a pretty big chunk of world leaders, I'm going to say that the UN delegates didn't respond; not the world.
2. If the US left the UN, the economy would be fine, because as much as we depend on foreign imports, other ocuntries depend a bit more on our exports.
And don't get me wrong; I'm not completely against all things UN. I just think that it should be restructured so that it has a bit more power behind its words. For example, the only countries to ever volunteer peace-keeping soldiers are Canada and Portugal. I mean, come on, those countries barely have a military. If someone threatened to have Canadian and Portugese soldiers keep peace in the US, for example, we'd probably laugh.
And my point with Iraq was that if the UN had more say-so, then Hussein's inhumane rule would have been put in check, and his arms (had they existed) would have been under control. Then there would be no war right now.
Also, when the UN tried to send food to Somalia, the food was taken by local warlords. I mean, they tried to do something, but didn't have the force to even complete it.
not to mention the Srebrenica Massacre, Rwandan Genocide...