QUOTE(DoomedOne @ Jun 15 2007, 02:20 PM)

1. The U.N. was built for a specific purpose. This purpose must change, as must the UNs laws. In essence, it must be replaced with the next incarnation of Global Government. The new UN would have no security council with 1 vote vetoes so countries like France, the USSR and ourselves would no longer be able to veto security issues. I mean, the security council formed during a very delicate time when it came to international relations, so the balance of power had to fall awkwardly and now policy that has long lost its meaning is still being manipulated.
I agree with your opinion on the removal of the security council.
Although I like to see my country have some special veto power, it causes a headache, a terrible one.
Anyway, I think the UN should become strongly democratic (I've gone over this somewhere else, I just know it). The UN should be based on a point system. For every million inhabitants, a country would have a vote worth 1 point. If it has less than a million inhabitants, then it would be a fraction of a point, etc. Anyway, the problem with this is that non-democratic nations would be abusing their people whenver they cast a vote, as their people would provide them their sway in the UN. As soon as democracy finds its place in every nation, which I don't see happening in my lifetime, this system might have some credibility.