The Fake Arguments Thread, For Those Ready to Start a (Fake) Fight Options

[Dark Reaper]

Star Wars Prequel trilogy > Original trilogy.

Blasphemer!!!!

[Kane]

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

[Sakiri]

Star Wars sucks.

*hides*

[Dark Reaper]

Star Wars sucks.

*hides*

Which one?.

[Sakiri]

All of it.

[Dark Reaper]

All of it.

Time for stoning!!!!

[Sakiri]

Does that stoning come with a hash pipe?

[Dark Reaper]

Does that stoning come with a hash pipe?

Uh----sure .

[TheCheshireKhajiit]

Does that stoning come with a hash pipe?

Hash pipe

[Sakiri]

Does that stoning come with a hash pipe?

Hash pipe

Lol. Been a long time since I heard that.

[TheCheshireKhajiit]

Does that stoning come with a hash pipe?

Hash pipe

Lol. Been a long time since I heard that.

And you’re welcome!

[RaderOfTheLostArk]

Anyone who does not use oxford commas is an uncultured subhuman and immediately doesn't know what they're talking about. Don't @ me.

(Real talk though: It makes me irrationally annoyed when I see oxford commas not being used.)

[TheCheshireKhajiit]

Da fuq is an Oxford comma?

[mALX]

[RaderOfTheLostArk]

Da fuq is an Oxford comma?

It's the comma that comes before "and" when you are listing three or more things in a sentence.

Oxford comma: 1, 2, and 3
No Oxford comma: 1, 2 and 3

It doesn't make any sense to me why you would use the latter and not the former. It implies 2 and 3 are part of the same thing when they aren't. The Oxford comma makes the separation clear.

Wise and totally legit words from Mr. Rickman.

[TheCheshireKhajiit]

Da fuq is an Oxford comma?

It's the comma that comes before "and" when you are listing three or more things in a sentence.

Oxford comma: 1, 2, and 3
No Oxford comma: 1, 2 and 3

It doesn't make any sense to me why you would use the latter and not the former. It implies 2 and 3 are part of the same thing when they aren't. The Oxford comma makes the separation clear.

Wise and totally legit words from Mr. Rickman.

Oh! Khajiit already does this so we’re good!

Also, RIP Mr. Rickman. We miss you terribly.

This post has been edited by TheCheshireKhajiit: Jan 30 2019, 01:43 AM

[Dark Reaper]

Rickman died the 14th of January 3 years ago. Man time really flies. I still have a hard time accepting Robin Williams death as well as Mr. Nemoy, It's so sad hearing about the deaths of celebrities you cared about .

This post has been edited by Dark Reaper: Jan 30 2019, 02:19 AM

[mALX]

I can't believe it has been three years since he passed! Yes, he is missed terribly. I agree too; that sometimes it feels like certain celebrities were such an important part of our lives; our memories throughout our lives include them in their roles that we loved. Alan Rickman was one of the biggest for me = so many of his roles were my favorite movies of all time; and I still watch them every chance I get.

[Decrepit]

I spent a while this evening typing out a fake argument that ties in with my recent birthday. Only, once it was done and proofed (yeah right) I began to question myself. Came here and reread this threads opening post. There it was, spelled out. Our arguments are to be "lighthearted." Mine, while humorous in a perverse sort of way, is anything but. Even prior to that, I had begun to worry that someone might unearth my 'argument' via web search and take it out of context. (It concerns a well-known event.) The argument is shelved, very likely permanently.

Or is the above fake, in part or the whole of it?

This post has been edited by Decrepit: Jan 30 2019, 03:23 PM

[mALX]

I spent a while this evening typing out a fake argument that ties in with my recent birthday. Only, once it was done and proofed (yeah right) I began to question myself. Came here and reread this threads opening post. There it was, spelled out. Our arguments are to be "lighthearted." Mine, while humorous in a perverse sort of way, is anything but. Even prior to that, I had begun to worry that someone might unearth my 'argument' via web search and take it out of context. (It concerned a well-known event.) The argument is shelved, very likely permanently.

Or is the above fake?