|
Now Illegal To Annoy People Over The Internet |
|
|
DoomedOne |
Jan 11 2006, 12:18 AM
|

Master

Joined: 13-April 05
From: Cocytus

|
Well think about it, they have the loophole that as long as you give you real name you can be annoying so that no one can say its against the first amendment, much like they have the law saying the government can't read emails without a warrant while they're in transfer, but the NSA scans every email that goes through the world wide web, they just wait until after its been transferred.
No one bothered to stand up against this loophole and get it changed, but it's caused a lot of problems, and this one causes pure oppression, but will people still even care enough? The water is turning up a few degress and nobody seems to notice.
--------------------
A man once asked the Buddha, "How does one escape the heat of the summer sun?"
And the Buddha replied, "Why not try crawling into the blazing furnace?"
|
|
|
|
Dantrag |
Jan 11 2006, 12:25 AM
|

Councilor

Joined: 13-February 05
From: The cellar of the fortress of the fuzz

|
QUOTE(DoomedOne @ Jan 10 2006, 06:18 PM) Well think about it, they have the loophole that as long as you give you real name you can be annoying so that no one can say its against the first amendment, much like they have the law saying the government can't read emails without a warrant while they're in transfer, but the NSA scans every email that goes through the world wide web, they just wait until after its been transferred. No one bothered to stand up against this loophole and get it changed, but it's caused a lot of problems, and this one causes pure oppression, but will people still even care enough? The water is turning up a few degress and nobody seems to notice. It should be able to be considered under the First Amendment. Anonymous writers might be annoying to someone that reads it, but is it illegal for that person to remain anonymous? No. The internet shouldn't be any different.
--------------------
"Its when murder is justice that martyrs are made"
|
|
|
|
Ragnar |
Jan 11 2006, 03:23 AM
|
Retainer
Joined: 20-August 05

|
That is pretty stupid. Honestly why should you be allowed to flame people if you reveal your real name? That is absurd. If they make one illegal(which is misguided in the first place as it would be very difficult to enforce) they should make the other illegal. Just goes to show you how stupid the American government is.
|
|
|
|
Marxist ßastard |
Jan 11 2006, 09:40 AM
|
Evoker
Joined: 1-January 06

|
The title means nothing. If one single congressman so wanted, he could slip in an amendment making it illegal not to perform a human sacrifice every Thursday (and then run slander ads against all his opponents for not supporting the "defend our homeland and help the poor abused women" bill).
Effectively, now whenever a must-pass legislation like this "defend our homeland and help the poor abused women" bill gets drafted, any single congressman can write whatever law he likes, assuming that he gets it slipped into the fine print of the bill -- relevant or not, completely contradictory to the spirit of the bill or not.
Eliminating such a thing would be a high priority for any fair government. Not so for a government that only needs to present the illusion of fairness to people like you, who will read only the titles of such bills and sadly represent the majority of voters.
--------------------
Passion is inversely proportional to the amount of real information available.
- Benford's Law of Controversy
|
|
|
|
Proweler |
Jan 17 2006, 01:35 AM
|
Retainer
Joined: 16-January 06

|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
Dantrag |
Jan 25 2006, 10:47 PM
|

Councilor

Joined: 13-February 05
From: The cellar of the fortress of the fuzz

|
QUOTE(DoomedOne @ Jan 24 2006, 11:43 PM) Yeah well we can to, so screw off mother, word to your wizzo. -John H. Gabriel I'm going to go call your house now. - John F. Gabriel
--------------------
"Its when murder is justice that martyrs are made"
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|