|
|
|
Now Listening To (The Resurrection), Musical Musings |
|
|
Sir Radont |
Sep 14 2008, 04:59 PM
|
Agent
Joined: 28-July 05
From: Colorado
|
My brothers' band just came out with their first EP so I've been listening to that and Flyleaf a lot.
--------------------
|
|
|
|
bbqplatypus |
Sep 19 2008, 01:08 AM
|
Finder
Joined: 12-July 08
From: The Double Deuce
|
I love Steve Winwood. Seriously, how could anyone NOT love Steve Winwood? On a related note, I find the title song to be really interesting - not just because it's a great song, but because of the symbolic figure and pagan tradition it refers to. "John Barleycorn" is the personification of grain (and the harvesting of same), and was himself derived from the ancient pagan tradition of the "sacred king," who would be appointed as lord of the harvest and, in some traditions, was ritually sacrificed. It was actually thought to be really common in pre-Mycenaean Greece. Now, not all such traditions stipulated that the sacred king be killed, but there's something about a male sacrificial symbol of fertility that I find morbidly fascinating. This post has been edited by bbqplatypus: Sep 19 2008, 01:31 AM
|
|
|
|
bbqplatypus |
Sep 24 2008, 05:43 AM
|
Finder
Joined: 12-July 08
From: The Double Deuce
|
I'm now listening to my favorite album of all time. This is my favorite album ever. Nowhere have I ever encountered a better treatise on what it is like to be a young man - angry, confused, and unsure of where to go. All the lame emo kids WISH they could say something this profound. It's really quite telling how the Who's albums are all still so relevant even today. ...Honestly, I've run out of ways to express how much I love the Who. You put on this album on a clear, hot summer day and it feels cold and rainy inside. Not to say that this album is perfect, because it's not. It isn't even the most flawless Who album - that would be Who's Next. It drags just a tad in places. It's one of those albums that demands your complete attention - it's not background music, and you can't listen to it while stoned (though the latter doesn't bother me, since I don't do drugs). But it reaches higher highs and connects on a more sincere, mature emotional level than any other album I've ever listened to, and for that it earns my top spot. One question, though - why isn't this album as popular as some of the Who's other albums? Why don't people talk about it like they do Dark Side of the Moon (or Tommy, for that matter)? What don't people get? I mean, I don't mean to insult anyone's personal taste, but...geez. Anywho, that's all I got to say. I gotta get runnin' now; always nippin' at someone's bleedin' 'eels. This post has been edited by bbqplatypus: Sep 24 2008, 05:54 AM
|
|
|
|
bbqplatypus |
Sep 25 2008, 02:11 AM
|
Finder
Joined: 12-July 08
From: The Double Deuce
|
And now I'm listening to Rumours by Fleetwood Mac. Do I really need to explain this one? This album sold about seventy-six kazabatrillion copies and went platinum about eight jillion times. Anyone who doesn't own it has already heard it nearly in its entirety if they have ever listened to classic rock radio for any period of time. For those of you who have been living under a rock, allow me to enlighten you. Rumours is the second album recorded by the fifth and most commercially successful lineup of the band Fleetwood Mac, a band that at one time changed lineups and even frontmen more often than I change my underwear. The only thing that every lineup of the band has in common is the rhythm section of Mick Fleetwood and John McVie, neither of whom contributed any songs. In other words, the band consisted of a stable group of sidemen supplanted by a rotating crew of frontmen, which makes it the opposite of, I don't know, pretty much every other band in fuc king history. But this incarnation of the band, unlike previous ones, had staying power - so much so that it's the only one most people have ever heard of (which is a bit of a shame, but I digress). The important thing is that they, unlike the previous lineups, produced catchy, melodic (if not particularly meaningful) 70s soft rock. Basically, they're a pop band descended from a blues outfit. But they're a good pop band, and this is their best album. The melodies are top-notch, and every song on it catches your ear in some way, from the creepy Stevie Nicks dirges to the swinging Christine McVie numbers to the generally perky and genial Nicks-Buckingham collaborations. This is an album that I like to listen to when I'm in a lighter mood. Now, if you're interested in hearing some earlier Fleetwood Mac, I recommend Bare Trees. But that's another album for another time. This post has been edited by bbqplatypus: Sep 25 2008, 02:15 AM
|
|
|
|
bbqplatypus |
Sep 28 2008, 06:59 AM
|
Finder
Joined: 12-July 08
From: The Double Deuce
|
So, treydog...I take it you're a Tom Waits fan. This is actually a great segue into who I'm listening to right now. It's a woman by the name of Jesca Hoop, who was actually a nanny for Tom Waits's kids for quite a while. Tom actually prodded her quite a bit to put her talents to use. Normally, I don't like weird, arty stuff like what she does, but I saw her open for Mark Knopfler a few months ago, and I was quite captivated by her performance. Her music has kind of a bewitching hypnotic quality to it, belying an odd combination of innocence and stream-of-consciousness depth. I won't have it on very often, but I like to listen every now and then for a change of pace from the classic rock I normally listen to. It's the sort of thing that I like in fairly small doses when the planets are aligned just right, but I still like it a lot. There isn't anything else in my library that's remotely like it. Here's a live version of my favorite song of hers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGcyOOIoLwYThis post has been edited by bbqplatypus: Sep 28 2008, 07:00 AM
|
|
|
|
treydog |
Sep 28 2008, 06:44 PM
|
Master
Joined: 13-February 05
From: The Smoky Mountains
|
Cool. Will have to check that out. Truthfully, some of Tom's weirder stuff (Black Rider, Bone Machine) leaves even me scratching my head. I don't so much mind his peculiar instrumentation (brake drum, anyone?) as the lyrical disjointedness of those albums. That is especially true because he can write some incredible lines-
"The moon's teeth marks are on the sky..."
"If I had all the money I used to spend on dope, I'd buy me a used car lot, but I wouldn't sell any of 'em. Just drive a different car every day, depending on how I feel."
On a different front, I have a good friend who is a major Traffic and Steve Winwood fan. He passed on these 2 jokes regarding "Higher Love." The first has to do with the instrumental opening:
"Steve just can't get his car started..." (For those who don't get it, listen to the opening... and put it on a loop.)
Second was a lyrical malaprop:
"Bring me a ham on rye" (As opposed to- "Bring me a higher love."
--------------------
The dreams down here aren't broken, nah, they're walkin' with a limp...
The best-dressed newt in Mournhold.
|
|
|
|
minque |
Oct 4 2008, 10:26 PM
|
Wise Woman
Joined: 11-February 05
From: Where I can watch you!!
|
QUOTE (those are vinyl records for those too young to remember). Ha....hilarious, treydoggie! I'm not too young to remember, I've got a bunch of those ancient thingies ...hihi Aaaaaaanyway, I've got my ipod loaded with about 5000 songs, so I have a lot to listen to... Then again I listened to an unknown cd in my car today, that is I didn't know it but my daughter probably does since she's the one who put it there...the song is called " An angry inch" ....Nope I won't tell what it is about but it was...interesting
--------------------
Chomh fada agus a bhionn daoine ah creiduint in aif�iseach, leanfaidh said na n-aingniomhi a choireamh (Voltaire)Facebook
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
|